top of page
Writer's picturePeyton Baird

Disconnect Between Commodity Prices and Mining Companies: 6 Geopolitical and Economic Factors at Play

6 minute read - Published 08:45 AM EST,  Monday September 9

This article was authored by Peyton Baird of witan nook. 

In recent years, an uncommon dissonance has emerged in the commodities sector: commodity prices continue to rise, yet the market valuations of mining companies producing these essential resources remain stagnant and undervalued, which makes it difficult to source attractive financing options and develop their resources to bring the minerals to market. This paradox raises questions about the underlying forces at play, suggesting that geopolitical tensions, economic instability, and structural industry issues are driving this disconnect. To understand this phenomenon, it is essential to delve into the intersection of global events, economic policies, and industry dynamics.

From Bust to Boom: Visualizing the Rise in Commodity Prices

From Bust to Boom: Visualizing the Rise in Commodity Prices | Visual Capitalist


Geopolitical Instabilities Shaping Market Perceptions and Commodity Prices

1. Ukraine-Russia Conflict and the Struggle for Agricultural Land

The war between Russia and Ukraine has severely disrupted global trade in agricultural products, energy supplies, and minerals. Ukraine, once dubbed the “breadbasket of Europe,” is also rich in mineral resources, particularly critical for agricultural equipment and infrastructure. With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, significant swathes of agricultural land have fallen under occupation, and what is not under occupation is much less efficiently farmed, sparking a battle for control not just of these fertile lands but also the underlying mineral wealth.


This has created a volatile geopolitical environment that spooks investors, particularly in the mining sector. While the demand for key minerals like potash and phosphates has surged due to agricultural disruptions, investors remain wary of committing capital to mining projects that could become entangled in broader geopolitical risks. The unpredictability of the conflict, along with economic sanctions, has made investment in Eastern European mining projects more speculative, which is reflected in the suppressed valuations of companies operating in or dependent on these regions which has transpired into making global capital investment wary of investing in mining projects all together, leading to this issue being felt heavily in North America.


2. Middle East Tensions and Their Economic Ripple Effects

Similarly, the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine, with involvement from the US and Iran, has profound implications for the global economy. The Middle East, rich in energy resources, remains a critical supplier of raw materials needed to fuel industries, including mining operations. However, continued instability in this region has triggered oil price spikes, contributing to inflationary pressures across the globe.


The heavy involvement of global powers, particularly the United States and Iran, adds another layer of complexity. The threat of broader regional conflict not only affects energy prices but also investor sentiment. Mining companies, which require stable energy supplies and often operate in regions with fragile political climates, are particularly susceptible to these shifts. For example, miners in Canada and the US are operating in a climate with the highest energy prices in history and little reprieve on the horizon. While commodity prices—especially oil—are soaring due to geopolitical risks, the uncertainty surrounding regional stability and energy access discourages long-term investments in mining companies, especially those heavily dependent on energy-intensive extraction processes.

The Israel - Palestine Conflict

The Israel - Palestine Conflict  | Sky News


Economic Policies and Financial Uncertainty

3. Loose Monetary Policy and Economic Instability

Globally, central banks have engaged in unprecedented money printing to counter the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent crises. While this surge in liquidity has led to a boom in asset prices, it has also stoked inflationary pressures, destabilizing economies. Inflation erodes purchasing power and leads to higher operational costs for mining companies, from fuel to wages to equipment. Though commodity prices rise in an inflationary environment, mining companies often struggle to pass on increased costs to their customers as quickly.


Furthermore, the excess liquidity in the financial system has contributed to speculative bubbles in sectors like technology, cryptocurrency, and gambling, siphoning off potential investment in traditional sectors such as mining. Investors seeking quick returns are more inclined to park their capital in high-growth tech companies rather than in the more capital-intensive, slower-moving mining sector, which is enduring value depression. This preference for high-growth sectors explains part of the disconnect between surging commodity prices and the underwhelming valuations of mining companies.

Currency in Circulation

Currency in Circulation  | FRED Economic Data


4. Political Polarization in the US and Its Economic Impact

The political division in the United States has exacerbated economic uncertainty. Deep-seated ideological differences between political parties have led to legislative gridlock, undermining the federal government’s ability to pass cohesive economic policies that could stabilize industries such as mining. The mining sector, which is heavily regulated and reliant on government infrastructure spending, faces an unpredictable regulatory environment, especially concerning environmental laws and land access.


Without clear policy direction from Washington, mining companies find it challenging to plan for the future, particularly for long-term, capital-intensive projects. The uncertainty surrounding tax policies, environmental regulations, and trade agreements diminishes investor confidence in mining stocks, even as the commodities they produce continue to rise in value. Additionally, tariffs and protectionist trade policies can disrupt supply chains and make it more costly for mining companies to access equipment and technology.


Structural Industry Issues: Supply, Demand, and Investment Gaps

5. High Demand for Minerals in Renewable Energy Transition

As the world shifts toward renewable energy, demand for critical minerals such as lithium, cobalt, and rare earth metals has skyrocketed. These materials are essential for the production of solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries, fueling a new wave of technological advancement. Yet, despite the growing demand for these resources, investment in mining companies remains sluggish for the aforementioned reasons, and more. 


One reason for this is the lengthy timeline required to develop new mining projects. From exploration to production, establishing a mine can take a decade or more, depending on regulatory approvals, community opposition, and environmental assessments. This time lag makes it difficult for mining companies to capitalize quickly on rising commodity prices. Investors, particularly those seeking short-term gains, may be discouraged by the long lead times and potential risks, opting instead for industries with faster returns.


Moreover, concerns over the environmental and social impacts of mining operations have led to growing opposition from local communities and stricter environmental regulations, which is paradoxical seeing as the necessary minerals for green technologies must be mined. These factors increase operational costs and make it harder for mining companies to scale up production quickly enough to meet soaring demand, further straining their market valuations.


6. Semiconductor Demand and Mineral Shortages

Another factor contributing to the disconnect between commodity prices and mining companies is the global semiconductor shortage. Semiconductors are critical for modern electronics and require substantial amounts of minerals, such as silicon and rare earth elements. While demand for semiconductors has surged due to the digital transformation of industries, supply chain bottlenecks and logistical challenges have hampered production. Mining companies, which are essential for providing the raw materials used in semiconductors, have not been able to meet this demand quickly enough.


Despite the rising value of semiconductor-related commodities, the underinvestment in mining infrastructure means that supply has not caught up with demand, contributing to higher commodity prices but stagnant company valuations. Investors remain cautious, fearing that supply constraints and regulatory hurdles could limit future profitability.

Minerals Used in Selected Clean Energy Technologies

Minerals Used in Selected Clean Energy Technologies  | IEA


A Complex Web of Geopolitical and Economic Factors

The disconnect between rising commodity prices and the stagnant valuations of mining companies can be traced to a confluence of geopolitical, economic, and structural industry factors. Geopolitical tensions in Ukraine and the Middle East, coupled with economic instability stemming from inflation and political division, have created a challenging environment for long-term investment in the mining sector. Additionally, the structural issues within the industry - such as lengthy project timelines, environmental concerns, and supply chain bottlenecks - exacerbate the disconnect.


As the global economy becomes more dependent on critical minerals for energy transitions and technological advancement, the mining industry’s challenges will likely persist. Investors, policymakers, and industry leaders will need to address these complex dynamics to bridge the gap between commodity prices and mining company valuations. Only through coordinated efforts can the mining sector regain its rightful place as a key player in the global economy’s future.


This article was authored by Peyton Baird of witan nook. 

Comments


bottom of page